Details Or Not

When watched from an unbiased view it is interesting but is it conclusive? Not at all besides that fact he’s not been among the living in over 10 years therefore without DNA evidence we’ll most likely never know for certain.

Courtesy of- 60 Minutes

The world is aware publicly notable people are accused of things all of the time but on the other hand as the world saw with R. Kelly there are predators in the field, we saw it with Weinstein, Epstein, innumerable figures in the entertainment industry in which were proven true. I will say as Oprah stated once during the post documentary release of ,Leaving Neverland, “Things are not always what they appear to be.” ESPECIALLY in the arts and entertainment realm. I didn’t know him, I’ve been acquainted with people who worked with him at most, etc but never met him therefore with that said I will say I do believe he placed himself in eyebrow raising positions that would facilitate such accusations. You would think he had learned the first time around you can’t trust people like that period. That vulnerability will draw unscrupulous con artists looking for an easy mark on one hand. As far as his behavior any accusation aside those are quite common for people who were on the prescription narcotics he was on. At most anyone can really be conclusive on, he was a very troubled individual as most of those types are. On the other hand as his attorney spoke on, “You have to look at motives and you have to look at facts” either way. Being a valid concrete provable #MeToo individual myself that MeToo revolutionized the way survivors like myself were treated and heard by society. It allowed for voices like my own to be heard for the facts that it is as Jackson’s attorney also spoke, “We have to be very careful to sift out what’s real and what is false.”

Courtesy of- JFacts